Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: ta the public domain pursuant to the 1902 Act and the amendments thereto H. PETTTIONER'S COLLATERAL FSTOPPEJ ARGU MENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY BEFORE THIS COURT WERE PREVIOUSLY DISAVOWED HIM BEFORE THIS COURT AND OTHERWISE LACK MERT Petitioner Hagen contends that the State of Utah is precluded from defending his attack on state couti jurisdiction because 10 collateral estoppel That issue was not raised 11 Hagen Petition for Writ Certiorari. and s not properly before this Court Further Hagen's argumenis lack ment Rule 14.1(a), Rules of the Supreme Court. provides that "[o]nly the set forth in the petition. 10 fairly included therein, will be considered Aq the Court. This rule protects the theory underlying the certioran piocess prevents the practice of 'smuggling" additional issues into case cert ...
(.png)
